The City Council took up the issue of selecting a City Prosecutor at last night’s Council meeting. This has been an divisive issue for the Council in that there are a variety of strong feelings on the matter. The City has outsourced its criminal prosecution legal services to the Gregerson Rosow law firm for many years. At least twenty. Maybe more. Beginning in 2004, individual Councilmembers began to question whether or not the City was getting the best deal it could get for the services it was buying. Staff studying the issue and issued a report in 2004 that said the City was paying about what other comparable cities were paying for outsourced prosecution services. Following the issuance of the 2004 report, the issue was dropped. But it was revived again in 2005 and staff produced an update of the 2004 report with about the same conclusion. This time, however, because the issue was being discussed during the budget preparation process for the City’s 2006-2007 City Budgets, the matter was not dropped. It was discussed all the way up until the final approval of the 2006-2007 budget in mid-December when the Council agreed to a significant cut in the criminal prosecution budget based on the hope that the City could get a better deal for these services. At the first meeting in January 2006, I went back to the Council and asked them to reappoint the Gregerson Rosow law firm as the City Prosecutor and to direct staff to do two things: assess the feasibility of establishing an in-house City staff prosecutor’s office and to conduct a competitive RFP for outsourced criminal prosecution services. We did both. We presented the final report to the Council at last night’s meeting.
In a Plan B Council-Manager form of city government - which is what we have in Eden Prairie - the City Attorney is selected by being nominated by the City Manager and confirmed by the City Council. After reviewing the estimated costs of establishing an in-house city staff prosecutor and reviewing the seven responses to our Request For Proposal (RFP) from private law firms interested in outsourcing our prosecution and interviewing three finalist law firms and reviewing their cost proposals in comparison to that of the incumbent firm and the estimated in-house prosecutor, I recommended staying the course by appointing Gregerson Rosow as the City’s outsourced City Prosecutor.
I then asked the Council to confirm that recommendation. It was not an easy decision for them. The Gregerson Rosow firm’s projected contract cost for 2007 is approximately $240,000. We had a proposal from a law firm for $120,000. We had another one for $195,500. The estimated cost of setting up an in-house staff-based prosecutor’s office was $220,625. From a cost standpoint, selecting Gregerson Rosow was not going to be an easy decision.
But we compared Gregerson Rosow’s costs to what the cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan, Edina, Maple Grove, Plymouth, and Woodbury pay for their outsourced prosecution services. Gregerson Rosow was right in the market with what those cities were paying. We also compared Gregerson Rosow’s outsourced costs to what the cities of Bloomington, Minnetonka, Coon Rapids, and Elk River pay their in-house staff city prosecutors and found that Gregerson Rosow’s costs were in right in the market when looked at from this perspective too.
The tough question was not “Could we do it cheaper?”. I knew the answer to that question. Of course we could do it cheaper. The tough question was “Could we do it better?” In my judgment the answer to that was not clear at all. In absence of a clear and convincing answer to that question, I decided to recommend the safest course of action which is to stay with a longtime partner who has provided exceptional service to the City - the Gregerson Rosow law firm.
The City Council debated the merits of my recommendation at last night’s meeting. They discussed the City’s relationship with Gregerson Rosow, the minimal tax impact of the potential savings the City might enjoy from selecting a lower cost service provider, the high level of support for the firm expressed by our Police Department and the nature of the criminal prosecutor’s work load. In the end, the Council voted 3-2 to approve my recommendation.
City Council’s must occasionally wrestle with difficult issues such as this one. The Council had a good debate on the prosecutor issue last night and reached a decision. Now it’s up to staff to make that decision work in the most cost effective way possible. We’ll start working on that immediately.







Our EPPD Reserve Unit was presented with The Minnesota Police Reserve Officer Association’s “Spotlight Award”. The award was presented to the unit at their monthly training meeting on Tuesday night. The award recognizes the quality police reserve units around the state.

