In the city government business, it can be difficult to interpret exactly what citizens are trying to tell me. They know. Each one of them knows exactly what he or she means when they tell me No, Yes, or Maybe. But from my side of the conversation, it’s seldom that simple. Here’s an op-ed commentary piece that I wrote for our local newspapers on the subject. Enjoy.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Eden Prairie News, August 12, 2004
Eden Prairie Sun Current, August 12, 2004
Discerning Public Opinion
It�s 2004 and it�s an election year. Now that Minnesota is officially defined as a �battle ground� state, we will soon have our fill of national, state, and local political debate. The process of submitting the choice of candidates for public office to the citizenry to decide by secret ballot voting is a core value of our American representative democracy. In the eyes of most citizens of our country, this process has served our country very well over the past 228 years.
On the other hand, the process of submitting public policy options to the citizenry to decide by voting is not enshrined in the founding documents of our country. It is an addendum to our democratic process that has been added in the relatively recent past. I think it�s fair to say that we are still trying to works all the bugs out of this aspect of our democracy.
On May 11, 2004 Eden Prairie citizens spoke and decided a matter of local public policy. They spoke collectively through the act of voting. On that date, a little over 5,000 citizens voted in a special referendum to decide whether the City of Eden Prairie should issue $22,500,000 of bonds to finance the construction of a number of parks and recreation improvement projects around the City. About 2,000 of them voted Yes, while the majority, about 3,000 residents voted No.
When citizens are asked to decide the fate of public policy issues, they must make a number of complex and interrelated judgments about the question or questions they are being asked to resolve. Instead of simply asking whether they would prefer one candidate or another, they are asked to do much more. They are asked to judge whether or not a particular project is needed; whether the proposed cost of the project is reasonable; and then whether the proposed increase in taxes in too burdensome or not.
The laws of our state say that the decision of the majority decides the issue, but, like most things in life, there are a number of gray areas, especially in a situation like the May 11th referendum. Was it the total size of the bond issue? Was it the list of projects, or a particular project? Was it the timing of the election? Was it the single question format of the ballot? Was it all or just some of the above?
I believe it is important for the City to have a more precise understanding of what exactly the voters opposed. There are many theories why the referendum was voted down. All of them are based on anecdote and instinct. And while I do want to dismiss anecdote and instinct as viable ways of discovering truth in the world, it is important for the City to have more reliable empirical information upon which we can base future decisions about our community�s parks and recreational facilities.
The City must now form a new policy direction and go forward. In a few weeks the City will be sponsoring a survey of a random sample of voters to try and determine what influenced their voting behavior on this issue on May 11, 2004.
We are listening to what you have to say. The upcoming survey is another example of the City Council�s desire to solicit your thoughts and feelings to help us plan for the Eden Prairie�s future. The message isn�t always easy to hear, and it�s not always clear, but we are doing our best to listen to all voices and to make public policy decisions that will be acceptable in the eyes of a broad spectrum in Eden Prairie. It won�t be easy, but making good public policy seldom is.