I depend every day on the work of Ms. Nilani Jayatilaka. Nilani works at the Messerli & Kremer Law Firm. The City employs Messerli & Kremer, through its membership in the Municipal Legislative Commission, to keep up on all things legislative while the State Legislature is in session each year. She tracks legislation; reports on individual bills; combs newspapers from around the state to keep up on the pulse of legislative issues around the state; and answers questions from people like me.
The following report is an example of the kind of reporting that Nilani provides to me throughout the session. This report is about the creation of new legislation to replace the 2003 Personal Protection Act, which was recently ruled unconstitutional by the Minnesota Courts. This is Nilani’s summary of the current status of the bill in the Minnesota Senate. Nilani does great work and I appreciate her efforts very much.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Guns Are Back At The Legislature

A bill reinstating the conceal carry law provided the focal point of discussion for the Mon., May 2, meeting of the Crime Prevention and Public Safety Committee. The panel, chaired by Sen. Leo Foley (DFL-Coon Rapids), sent the bill to the Rules and Administration Committee without recommendation.
Sen. Pat Pariseau (R-Farmington) carried S.F. 2259, which reenacts the law with a few changes. Among the changes, said Pariseau, is a provision striking the requirement that private establishments both post a sign prohibiting firearms and personally inform individuals of the posted request. Pariseau said it is necessary to reinstate conceal carry because the law was struck down by an appellate court. The court struck down the previous law because of the single subject provision in the state constitution.
Gene German, American Association of Certified Firearms Instructors (AACFI), said people who carry firearms are trained, responsible, trustworthy and law abiding citizens. He said being able to carry a gun allows individuals to have a tool to use as a last resort to protect one’s self against threat. “I have a right to be my own first responder and so do you,” said German. Joseph Olson, president, Conceal Carry Reform Now (CCRN), said the number of permits revoked under the law is .064 percent. “Permit holders are the kind of folks who stop at a stoplight at 4a.m. and wait because it’s red. They don’t get in trouble,” said Olson. He said several states have implemented the law successfully. “These laws works,” Olson said. John Caile, also of CCRN, said the issue is not about whether or not citizens are allowed to carry firearms. “This is about fair, unbiased issuance of carry permits,” said Caile.
Former Governor Arne Carlson spoke in opposition to the bill. The measure, he said, takes power away from local governments and consolidates authority in the state. As a result, said Carlson, the law shows a distrust of local government and a lack of recognition of the differences amongst various local communities. Carlson said that state institutions, such as jails, courts, police departments and government centers, ban firearms on their premises. “We’re passing policies that we ourselves are not willing to live by,” he said. Rev. Richard E. Pates, Minnesota Catholic Conference, also spoke in opposition to the measure. He said an individual who desires to carry a weapon in public should have a specific job or public safety related reason to do so. Pastor Pam Fickensher said allowing firearms on church property is contrary to the principles of several faiths. She said the bill infringes on religious freedom by allowing guns in areas near religious facilities, such as church parking lots. “Respect our right to control our religious properties,” said Fickensher. “Doors are a place to post religious messages, not state-sanctioned language,” she said.
Sen. Don Betzold (DFL-Fridley) offered an amendment to delete provisions specifying that an address is not required to obtain a permit. Senators also incorporated language allowing applicants to specify townships as part of the address. The amendment was adopted. Members also adopted an amendment, offered by Betzold, to conform Minnesota law to federal law with regard to individuals who are prohibited from possessing a hand-gun. Betzold said federal law prohibits individuals convicted of certain crimes from possessing a weapon.
Sen. Thomas Neuville (R-Northfield) pointed out that it would not make sense to issue someone a hand gun permit if the person cannot possess a gun under federal law anyway. Betzold offered another amendment specifying which organizations may provide training for permit applicants. The amendment was adopted. The committee also adopted an amendment, offered by Betzold, specifying that if a permit becomes void, officials do not need to go through an official revocation process to nullify it.
Senators also adopted an amendment, offered by Sen. Wesley Skoglund (DFL-Mpls.), to prohibit guns on school and youth organization properties. The committee incorporated language specifying that the amendment applies to properties of youth organizations being used to provide services to minors. Skoglund offered another amendment making the permits invalid for individuals while they are consuming alcohol or drugs. The amendment was adopted. Skoglund offered a third amendment to allow government units, as well as private property owners, to prohibit firearms on their property, and to allow them to post a “guns welcome” sign. “Under the amendment, the presumption is that, unless a ‘guns welcome’ sign is posted, there will be no guns,” said Skoglund. Neuville said the adoption of the amendment guts the bill. “You won’t know which locations permit the weapons and which don’t. It renders the law meaningless,” he said.
Sen. Dave Kleis (R-St. Cloud) said the amendment not only significantly changes the bill, but also makes the bill more strict than it was before the first conceal carry bill was passed. Skoglund withdrew the amendment and offered another one, which he said is similar, that takes out the state government, leaving only private property owners and local units of government. “The amendment still switches the presumption,” said Skoglund. “It means you don’t bring your gun to the store unless the sign says your gun is welcome,” he said. The amendment did not prevail, 1-7. The committee adopted an amendment, offered by Skoglund, allowing religious establishments to ban guns unless the establishments post “guns welcome” signs.
Sen. Linda Berglin (DFL-Mpls.) offered an amendment allowing local units of government to decide whether or not permit holders may bring guns onto local government property, including parks. She said the amendment will treat local units of government like other entities are treated in law. The amendment was adopted.
Sen. Jane Ranum (DFL-Mpls.) offered an amendment to require fingerprinting of the permit applicants. Sen. Carrie Ruud (R-Breezy Point) said requiring the finger prints treats permit applicants like they are criminals. Ranum said finger prints are required for several activities, such as job background checks. The amendment was adopted.