I find the recent controversy regarding the resume of the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA), Mr. Michael Brown, to be really interesting. It’s interesting to me because it centers on the organizational nomenclature that we use in city government. That’s not a subject that you see discussed much in the national news.
A September 8 story in Time magazine’s online edition raised a number of questions about Mr. Brown’s resume, specifically about Brown’s bio on the FEMA website. Here’s a paragraph from the Time story that seems to be creating the most heat for Mr. Brown:
Before joining FEMA, his only previous stint in emergency management, according to his bio posted on FEMA’s website, was “serving as an assistant city manager with emergency services oversight.” The White House press release from 2001 stated that Brown worked for the city of Edmond, Okla., from 1975 to 1978 “overseeing the emergency services division.” In fact, according to Claudia Deakins, head of public relations for the city of Edmond, Brown was an “assistant to the city manager” from 1977 to 1980, not a manager himself, and had no authority over other employees. “The assistant is more like an intern,” she told TIME. “Department heads did not report to him.” Brown did do a good job at his humble position, however, according to his boss. “Yes. Mike Brown worked for me. He was my administrative assistant. He was a student at Central State University,” recalls former city manager Bill Dashner. “Mike used to handle a lot of details. Every now and again I’d ask him to write me a speech. He was very loyal. He was always on time. He always had on a suit and a starched white shirt.”
So what’s the big deal? What’s the difference between someone who is an Assistant City Manager and someone who is an Assistant to the City Manager?
Well, I’d say there is a difference. But I’d also say that the magnitude of the difference depends on the individual organization. There is very little standardization in municipal position titles in this country. The same can be said about organizational structures of municipal governments in this country. Not much standardization there either. I’d argue that there shouldn’t be either, but that’s a post for another day.
Typically, an Assistant City Manager reports directly to the City Manager and acts as City Manager when the City Manager is absent. Sometimes the Assistant City Manager has a the same bureaucratic rank as the senior department directors or department heads in the city government. Department heads are people like the Public Works Director, Police Chief, Fire Chief, Community Development Director, and the Parks & Recreation Director in our organization. In some organizations, however, the Assistant City Manager is a rank above the department heads. This particular distinction in the bureacratic positioning doesn’t really matter that much because, in most cases, it is clear that the Assistant City Manager is the #2 person in the organization behind the City Manager.
An Assistant to the City Manager is, typically, a bureaucratic rank (or two) below the department heads. An Assistant to the City Manager is not expected to assume the organizational reins when the City Manager is absent from duty. “Assistant To’s”, as they are often referred to as in city government, are usually people that are new to the field of municipal government or they have a specific expertise that is important to local government, but might not involve supervising any employees or specific city functions. For example, an Assistant To might be charged with managing a city’s cable television franchise or it’s cemetery operations or its policy research functions. Assistant To’s generally do not settle into the Assistant To position for a career. Some do, but most do not. It is a more common path for them to move up to an Assistant City Manager position; up into a department head position; or out of local government altogether.
In Eden Prairie, I do not have an Assistant City Manager. When I am absent from the City for an extended period of time, I appoint one of my department heads to be the “Acting City Manager” until I return to work. I usually rotate the designation among them. They are all very capable people. I do, however, have an Assistant to the City Manager. His name Is Michael Barone. Mike’s duties, among many things, include policy research, citizen advisory commission management, departmental performance management, and strategic plan development.
I don’t know if Mr. Brown pumped up his resume or not. He’s having a tough time right now, so I won’t pile on. What I will say though is that the difference between the two positions - Assistant City Manager and Assistant To The City Manager - is much more than just the words “To The”.