For those readers of this blog who are familiar with Eden Prairie, you know there is a large electrical transmission power line that cuts right through the middle of the commercial retail area just west of the Eden Prairie Center mall. We think this area is going to be the center of Eden Prairie’s future downtown. For years people have contemplated the potential development benefits to the City of moving or burying those power lines. This year we finally did something more than just contemplate it. The City hired the engineering consulting firm Black and Veatch to study the feasibility of the idea and to estimate its cost.
At our Council meeting last night, our Public Works Director Gene Dietz presented the Black & Veatch report on the power lines to the Council. Here are the salient facts of his report regarding the proposal to bury this power line underground:
· The new dielectric cable that they (Black & Veatch) are estimating is between 5 ½ and 6 inches in diameter and costs an estimated $180 per foot
· There are 12 cables required
· That would be $2160 per foot-just for the cable
· No one in the United States manufactures this kind of cable-it comes from Japan and one or two other places in Europe
· Splices in cable are the weak link-the first splice in the US of this kind of cable occurred only 2 years ago
· It may be cheaper to have two duct banks-one on each side of the right of way in order to dissipate the heat effectively
· A complication may occur-Xcel is considering modifying their “safety factor” for overhead wiring design. It turns out that they design the cable to have a somewhat steady wind velocity of 2 mph. They are considering changing their design philosophy to assume 4 mph. What does wind speed have to do with wire capacity you ask (my question precisely)-more wind more heat dissipation. With 4 mph wind speed, they can crank up the dial and increase the capacity from about 900 amps to 1100 amps with no hardware change in an overhead situation. But, in underground, more amps more heat-more heat more cost to bury.
· As noted by the cost, a burial project of this scope would be a tremendous undertaking.
The most notable fact from Gene’s report is that the cost of taking this large transmission line and converting it from its current status as an overhead line to an underground line is estimated at $21.5 million dollars.
If the project moves ahead, who would bear that cost? Well, it’s not likely to be Xcel Energy. They’re fine with the power line just as it is. Would the City pay this cost? Doubtful. I did not ask the Council last night, but I would not recommend it and I doubt very much the Council would authorize it. The most likely scenario is that a real estate developer would pay for this project, but only if the developer were going to do a massive redevelopment project in the area and the economics of burying the power line were favorable for the project. Short of that scenario, I don’t think this project is going to happen.
Nonetheless, if you’re interested in knowing more about the details of the Black & Veatch report, I’ve copied it into the blog below. Enjoy!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
City of Eden Prairie B&V Project 161935
Relocation of Existing 345kV Transmission Line B&V File No. 40.0000
Buried Route & Aerial Re-Route B&V Letter No. 002
June 26, 2008
Via Mail & Email
Attn: Eugene A. Dietz
Director of Public Works
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Subject: Final Cost Estimate Report
Dear Mr. Dietz,
As requested by the City of Eden Prairie, Black & Veatch completed a Conceptual Estimate for the
relocation of an existing double circuit 345kV overhead transmission line. The cost estimates were
performed on two options: buried route and aerial route.
Option 1 - Buried Route: 3,700 feet 345kV Double Circuit Underground Transmission
Line
Black & Veatch estimates that the complete engineering, procurement and construction of the
underground lines would cost approximately $21.5 million. Minor changes in the route length (less than
500 feet) can be estimated by adjusting the total cost by $3,580 per foot of route length difference.
Cable Sizing
The required combined current capacity for both circuits was given as 3,928 amps (2,347 MVA). Each
individual circuit is required to carry 1,964 amps (1,174 MVA). No requirement was given for operation of
one circuit at a time or short term emergency loading.
Preliminary cable ampacity calculations indicate that a cable with a 3500 kcmil segmental copper
conductor can meet these requirements. These calculations are based on one common concrete duct
bank for two underground cable circuits with two cables per phase for each circuit, a maximum cover of
11.5 feet over the concrete duct bank (15 feet bottom of trench), ambient soil temperature of 25°C, native
soil thermal resistivity of 0.9°C-M/Watt, and daily load factor of 80 percent. These assumptions need to
be verified during design. The variations of assumptions will affect the cable size.
According to Tony Moore (612-330-6534) of Xcel Energy, a possible future re-rating of the existing
overhead line to 2,314 amps (1,920 MVA) per circuit may be required to be taken into account in planning
the project. The possibility of the future re-rating is now under internal evaluation by Xcel Energy. To
achieve this rating, the circuits would have to be installed in two separated concrete duct banks, which
requires a separation of approximately 20 feet to meet the loading requirement. This would double the
cost of paving replacement for an additional $760,000 added to the construction price, before
contingency or escalation.
Basis of Estimate
The estimate is based on the installation of a double circuit duct bank under city roads or parking lots for
the entire length. A conceptual duct bank cross section is included as an Attachment. The estimate is
1 of 3
BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION · 11401 Lamar Avenue · Overland Park, KS 66211 · 913-458-2000 · Fax 913-458-2934
based on construction in an urban/suburban area. The estimate is based on 2008 costs with no
escalation for later construction.
The duct bank is based on two 3 x 3 arrangements of nine (9) 6 inch Schedule 40 PVC conduits for each
circuit. In each circuit, six (6) conduits will be used for 345kV power cable while three (3) more conduits
are reserved as spares and for communication circuits. The conduits are separated with a 3 inch edge to
edge spacing to diffuse heat and allow for the placement of concrete between the conduits. The two
circuits are separated by an empty duct spacer to increase the line capacity. The conduits are encased
in thermal concrete, which is a high density, low air entrainment concrete having a low thermal resistivity.
Above the duct bank, a corrective backfill such as fluidized thermal backfill (FTB) is required to meet the
cable ampacity. FTB is a low strength concrete mixture with a low thermal resistivity. Directly below the
pavement a suitable road material such as crushed rock or coarse sand should be used to allow for
drainage and expansion of the pavement. The estimate assumes pavement restoration will be for 10′
wide panels.
Right of Way, Easements
When in public roads, a separation of 3 feet is suggested between the duct bank and all other crossing or
parallel utilities. These separations should be increased for any utilities that generate heat.
For the permanent easement outside of the public right of way, space needs to be maintained for the
repair of possible cable faults. The widest portion of the installation, near the splicing vaults will be
approximately 18 feet wide. Adding space for a truck alongside for possible maintenance requires a
permanent easement of 30 feet wide.
Construction easements will be based on the room required to set the splicing vaults. The splicing vaults
will require excavations up to 26 feet wide. Adding space for a truck to either side of the excavation
requires a construction easement of 55 to 60 feet wide.
Separating the duct banks based on the possible future re-rating of the overhead line would increase both
the permanent and construction easements by 15 to 20 feet.
Option 2 - Aerial Re-Route: 6,200 Feet 345kV Double Circuit Overhead Transmission Line
Black & Veatch estimates that the complete engineering, procurement and construction of the overhead
line re-route would cost approximately $4.2 million. For this short project with mainly angled structures,
this estimate breaks down to approximately $678 per foot. The following sections describe the basis for
this estimate.
Structure Type
Single pole structures were used for this estimate due to right-of-way limitations. These double circuit
345kV monopole structures have shield wire and conductor arms, totaling eight (8) arms per structure.
The estimate assumes six (6) total structures, two (2) tangent structures, three (3) medium angle
deadend structures, and one (1) large angle deadend structure. Tangent structures are assumed to be I-
string configuration, and deadend structures are deadended and jumpered on arms. All structures are
assumed to be installed on drilled pier foundations.
Two (2) 795 ACSR “Drake” conductors were used per phase. A maximum span of 1,105 feet was
assumed.
The starting and ending cut-in structures are planed to be reused in this estimate. Reuse of the north
structure will likely require some rework of vangs or pole bands.
2 of 3
BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION · 11401 Lamar Avenue · Overland Park, KS 66211 · 913-458-2000 · Fax 913-458-2934